Bill Clinton recently said that global warming is a greater threat toÃ‚Â humanity than terrorism, whichÃ‚Â would explainÃ‚Â why Hillary has been so busy in past years trying to chill the place down.
Al Gore agrees. As a matter of fact, Al’s been trying to make up for all the jet fuel it takes to fly him to environmental speeches by… not farting… or something like that:
He (Gore)Ã‚Â said he was “carbon neutral” himself and he tried to offset any plane flight or car journey by “purchasing verifiable reductions in CO2 elsewhere”.
So,Ã‚Â is the carbon neutral Gore, andÃ‚Â Clinton,Ã‚Â correct, or is the comparison of a proven threat toÃ‚Â a scientificallyÃ‚Â unproven oneÃ‚Â like saying “the boogeyman is more dangerous than Osama Bin Laden”? Take a second to answer the following poll question:
Since there are always more than two answers to any question, I’ve come up with a variety of responses from which to choose.
This poll contains a margin of error of plus or minus three belt bombers and four junk scientists.
Thanks for participating. I wish you all a carbon neutral Tuesday.
Note: If you’re seeing only this post, the entire blog can be accessed by clicking here.