I’ve been out most of the night aimlesslyÃ‚Â driving around inÃ‚Â a Hummer to do my part toÃ‚Â help save the ice-threatenedÃ‚Â citrus crops — what did I miss?
It looks like theÃ‚Â U.S. Senate has stayed busy byÃ‚Â passing ethics reform legislation. Don’t you wish we all had jobs where we could design the laws that govern our own organization? I’ll give Congress a break though, since they’re usuallyÃ‚Â engaged in theÃ‚Â selfless act of creatingÃ‚Â inane laws for the rest of us that they completely forget about themselves. Not this time.
I haven’t read the reform bill, as I never seem to find myself that bored, but rest assured it contains more loopholes than the wall between wood shop and the girls’ locker room at Enzyte High.
I don’t know about you, but IÃ‚Â sleep much better at night knowing that Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Chris Dodd, et al, canÃ‚Â no longerÃ‚Â accept a free toaster when they open a new bank account with our money. That should straighten things out. The Senate passing “ethics reform” is a little like ifÃ‚Â Ike Turner would have proposed aÃ‚Â bill to combat spousal abuse that included the single measure ofÃ‚Â strengthening Tina’s jaw.
That aside, the House of Representatives has been busy as well. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has created a “Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming”:
“I am asking the committees that have jurisdiction over energy, environment and technology policy to report legislation on these issues by June.Ã‚Â We hope to have legislation on global warming and energy independence through the committees by July 4th, so that this year, Independence Day is also Ã¢â‚¬ËœEnergy Independence Day.'”
Yes! “Energy Independence Day”! The day we as Americans celebrate our glorious victory over… power?
You would think that people so concerned with energy independence would be up north drilling Alaska with the fervor ofÃ‚Â Charlie Sheen at the Mustang Ranch, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. Why not? Alaska’s Senators have raked in more “road to…” pork than Bing Crosby and Bob Hope, but none of those roads will lead to ANWR any time soon. Build more refineries? Sure, and maybeÃ‚Â Courtney Love will open a finishing school.
When Democrats speak of “energy independence,” they’re not talking about independence from the Middle East — they’re talking aboutÃ‚Â liberating “big oil” from their profits. The definition of “independence” is in the eye of the beholder.
But of course, “big oil” is contributing to global warming, which is why the two issues are tied together in Pelosi’s committee.Ã‚Â The global warming theory has itsÃ‚Â core followers, many of whom are also proud owners of Colorado swampland, the Brooklyn Bridge, and other stuff from the back of Mr. Haney’s pickup truck, but many others require a little more convincing.
Remaining skeptics of Gore-style global warming may just be a littleÃ‚Â uncomfortable hitching the direction of the future of the human race to somebody who once spent eight years kick saving morality slapshots for his boss, while his wife, Tipper, stuck parental warning stickers everywhere except where they really belonged — on Bill Clinton’s pants. Maybe this is why Gore said nary a word about the looming threat of global warming when he was actually in a position to do something about it.
PerhapsÃ‚Â Nancy Pelosi can find a more convincing –Ã‚Â and less laughable –Ã‚Â angle. She may well do just that,Ã‚Â becauseÃ‚Â Pelosi sees things the rest of us can’t. That ability is bound to grow in the coming years, as Nancy is just one facelift away from having eyes on the back of her head.
Note: If you’re seeing only this post, the entire blog can be accessed at DougPowers.com