Also known in classier circles as “grudge f*#k,” Playboy is now doing a feature about conservative women in a way that would have the angry hags from the NOW picketing outside their bunny-clad doors if they did anything remotely similar about liberal women — though I don’t know whey they’d be so ticked-off — it’s not like they’d be on the list.
Ed Morrissey sums up what Playboy’s up to now:
Playboy likes to claim that it prints pictures of naked women as a means to empower them. Uh-huh. It seems that Playboy and Hugh Hefner only like to empower women to the extent that theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll take off their clothes, but when they open their mouths and have an opinion Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ well, then itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s time to roll out the demonization. They have a new feature on the website that features Ã¢â‚¬â€ and IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m not making this up Ã¢â‚¬â€ conservative women theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢d like to Ã¢â‚¬Å“hate-f**kÃ¢â‚¬Â (link NSFW)
From Michelle Malkin to Megyn Kelly to Elisabeth Hasselbeck to Michele Bachmann, come and see liberal tolerance and the promotion of female empowerment at its finest — but only for the articles, of course.
Figuring that one good spurn deserves another (after all, what liberal doesn’t like “fairness”?), I thought I’d return the favor.
So, without further adieu, here are the “Top Ten Liberal Women I’d Like to Hate F*#k”:
There’s… uh… one of them would be… um…
Well, there’s Aman… no wait, she’s not liberal.
Ooh, there was that one chick with the reddish hair who was on CNN in the mid-80’s… but I can’t remember her name and I’m not sure she was liberal.
So… gee, you’ll have to give me a few minutes on this… it’s like trying to make Viagra out of saltpeter.
Thanks to Playboy for reminding me about this classic: