<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Constitutionality of Obamacare: &#8216;Who Cares?&#8217; Part III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougpowers.com/2009/11/03/the-constitutionality-of-obamacare-who-cares-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougpowers.com/2009/11/03/the-constitutionality-of-obamacare-who-cares-part-iii/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, musings and commentary by columnist Doug Powers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unconstitutional: Florida judge strikes down Obamacare mandate; full decision embedded; all 47 GOP Senators sign on to DeMint repeal bill; White House reax: ruling is â€œodd,â€ â€œoverreachingâ€ â€œactivism;â€ DOJ readies appeal &#124; Ace Campaign</title>
		<link>http://dougpowers.com/2009/11/03/the-constitutionality-of-obamacare-who-cares-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-14997</link>
		<dc:creator>Unconstitutional: Florida judge strikes down Obamacare mandate; full decision embedded; all 47 GOP Senators sign on to DeMint repeal bill; White House reax: ruling is â€œodd,â€ â€œoverreachingâ€ â€œactivism;â€ DOJ readies appeal &#124; Ace Campaign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 01:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougpowers.com/?p=5115#comment-14997</guid>
		<description>[...] to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed?The word of the day: &#8220;Void.&#8221;The constitutional clause of the day: The Commerce [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed?The word of the day: &#8220;Void.&#8221;The constitutional clause of the day: The Commerce [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word of the Day: Unconstitutional &#124; Intolerant Fox</title>
		<link>http://dougpowers.com/2009/11/03/the-constitutionality-of-obamacare-who-cares-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-14985</link>
		<dc:creator>Word of the Day: Unconstitutional &#124; Intolerant Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougpowers.com/?p=5115#comment-14985</guid>
		<description>[...] Word of the Day:&#160;Unconstitutional  Posted on January 31, 2011 by intolerantfox   From Michelle Malkin: Hey, remember when conservatives objected to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Word of the Day:&nbsp;Unconstitutional  Posted on January 31, 2011 by intolerantfox   From Michelle Malkin: Hey, remember when conservatives objected to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Unconstitutional: Florida judge strikes down Obamacare mandate; full decision embedded</title>
		<link>http://dougpowers.com/2009/11/03/the-constitutionality-of-obamacare-who-cares-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-14980</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Unconstitutional: Florida judge strikes down Obamacare mandate; full decision embedded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougpowers.com/?p=5115#comment-14980</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey, remember when conservatives objected to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey, remember when conservatives objected to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge to Obamacare architects: Ahem. Meet the Constitution, power-grabbers. &#124; Feed News from around the World</title>
		<link>http://dougpowers.com/2009/11/03/the-constitutionality-of-obamacare-who-cares-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-13041</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge to Obamacare architects: Ahem. Meet the Constitution, power-grabbers. &#124; Feed News from around the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougpowers.com/?p=5115#comment-13041</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey, remember when conservatives objected to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey, remember when conservatives objected to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: americanconservativenews.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Judge to Obamacare architects: Ahem. Meet the Constitution, power-grabbers.</title>
		<link>http://dougpowers.com/2009/11/03/the-constitutionality-of-obamacare-who-cares-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-12868</link>
		<dc:creator>americanconservativenews.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Judge to Obamacare architects: Ahem. Meet the Constitution, power-grabbers.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougpowers.com/?p=5115#comment-12868</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey, remember when conservatives objected to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey, remember when conservatives objected to the Obamacare federal individual mandate on constitutional grounds and the liberal establishment laughed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

