Or something like that…

Normally you have to travel to the Amazon to see snakes the size of Robert Gibbs. If you watch the video you’ll notice Gibbs says Obama didn’t take PAC money from Goldman.

Here’s Open Secrets’ list of top Obama campaign donors, with the explanation of the chart first:

This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2008 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organization’s PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals’ immediate families.

University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132

So yes, he took a ton of Goldman cash, PAC or otherwise.

Gibbs did have something kind of correct when he in essence said this: “They gave Obama money knowing he hated them, so it’s their fault.”

It also ensures a nice “circle of life” though. Like I wrote the other day, Goldman Sachs didn’t get an Obama-induced taxpayer bailout because they were too big to fail — they got it because without Wall Street’s money, Democrats will fail.

Wall Street and Washington now have a nice little “Pimp & Whore” arrangement worked out — it’s just that I haven’t yet figured out which is which.

Comments

3 Responses to “Gibbs: Obama Didn’t Take Goldman Sachs Donations, He Won’t Return it, and They Shouldn’t Have Given it to Him Anyway Knowing How Much He Hates Wall Street”

  1. Joe Redfield on April 21st, 2010 7:49 pm

    The sore thumb that sticks out from the donor list is…the University of California!?. This looks like prima facie evidence that the UC system is wildly overpaying its faculty and staff, even granting that it includes many more campuses than Moscow-by-the-Bay.

  2. Nanny on April 21st, 2010 11:08 pm

    opensecrets.org has a great bit of info as to who donated and how much. Gibbs is hysterical in his explanations – he actually should be a regular on the Stewart/Colbert circuit to do his um-him-num-hm-um-um-maybe-hum-num stand up routine.

  3. Tom Beebe on April 22nd, 2010 4:56 pm

    Smells like Chicago ! I wish a few other states would demand proof of citizenship to get on the ballot. I can hear the Dem lawyers gearing up to fight this one to the SCOTUS. How long will America tolerate this corruption?? Slick Willie usually, though inadvertantly, has it right. There will be an uprising.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.