Hillary Clinton was on 60 Minutes and spoke with Scott Pelley about Chelsea’s upcoming wedding, for which Bill is no doubt hard at work “screening” potential bridesmaids (sources tell me that a local dry cleaner along with a Stanley Steemer Rapid Response Team are on emergency standby for the rehearsal and wedding reception).

Pelley asked Hillary about the date of her daughter’s wedding, and Hillary said “You’re more likely to get the nuclear launch code” than the date of the wedding.

Now, you might be asking yourself, “Hillary has the nuclear codes?” Given who’s president, hell, who doesn’t have them by now?

(Cackle-from-hell warnings at the :16 and :28 mark)

This pretty much sums up the national security focus of this administration, doesn’t it? Exact details about the US nuclear arsenal are gladly given out, but the date of a wedding is a tightly guarded secret.

(h/t HotAirPundit)

Comments

4 Responses to “Hillary More Likely to Give You the Nuclear Launch Code Than the Date of Chelsea’s Wedding”

  1. Mark1957 on May 10th, 2010 12:46 pm

    How many Leftist dictators will be on the guest list ? I can just imagine a Che China pattern and a Honeymoon at Hugo's house.

  2. Joyanna Adams on May 10th, 2010 11:21 pm

    "I've gotten very good at keeping secrets." That's just….creepy.

    No..kidding. All that Chinese money, the 60 deaths of people surrounding the Clintons, Ron Brown death, ah… Vince…shredded papeers….the REAL reason they got married…Rockefeller, and that's just what they kid about…Don't get me started. The secrets Hillary carrys is beyond comprehention, and she will go with them to her grave.

  3. Nick on May 11th, 2010 12:59 pm

    Tin Foil hat alert!

  4. Michelle Malkin » Location of Chelsea Clinton’s Wedding Still a Secret (I’ll Bet Ecuador Knows) on June 21st, 2010 3:21 pm

    [...] said she was more likely to give up the nuclear launch codes than the date and place of Chelsea’s wedding, but since Obama’s probably already done [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.