Nidal Hasan murdered 13 people during his rampage at Ft. Hood, and he yelled “Allahu Akbar” during the shootings. He’s been linked to radical Imam Anwar al-Awlaki. Al Qaeda spokesman Adam Gadahn praised Hasan as a “pioneer, a trailblazer and a role-model.”

And yet the New York Times has no idea what might have been Hasan’s motive:

A parade of prosecution witnesses — many of them still struggling with their wounds — provided a gripping, almost cinematic account of the attack in which 13 people died and dozens were wounded.

Yet the gunman and his motive remain an enigma. And there were few clues about what sort of defense Major Hasan, a 40-year-old Army psychiatrist, would mount in the face of such overwhelming evidence.
[...]
Over three days, more than two dozen witnesses at the hearing described how Major Hasan shouted “Allahu akbar!” and then opened fire with a laser-guided handgun at a crowd of soldiers as they waited to see medical staff members before deployment. He gunned down one man who tried to hit him with a chair and chased another soldier out of the building to shoot him, witnesses said.

Wow… the Times is as clueless and “weapons grade ignorant” as Behar and Goldberg.

Comments

7 Responses to “NY Times: Man Yells ‘Allahu Akbar’ While Murdering People at Ft. Hood, Motive Unknown”

  1. Clu Seatoe on October 17th, 2010 11:42 am

    No one is as blind as he who will not see.

    – Somebody said it

  2. Dandapani on October 17th, 2010 12:46 pm

    Clueless.

  3. SignPainterGuy on October 17th, 2010 2:54 pm

    "– Somebody said it" …. and many remember it !!

    "Clueless" and I would add, "willfully" ignorant !!

    IMHO, in cases like this, the "reward" should be postponed for as long as possible with the interim being made as horrible and uncomfortable as possible ! A taxpayer-dime "well spent" !!

    Let`s not forget the smallest victim among those murdered and wounded; the unborn child ! The total is 14 !! He / She counts too !!

  4. OK_Loyalist on October 17th, 2010 3:08 pm

    I say shoot him in the heart with a frozen bacon grease bullet.

  5. Rick on October 17th, 2010 3:10 pm

    His punishment is to be swift and sure.

    He is not to be executed,so collecting his virgins in a timely manner is problematic.

    Commit your crime and it’s on the taxpayer’s dime.

  6. SignPainterGuy on October 17th, 2010 9:54 pm

    But if The Times were to go out of business, just think of all the liberal orders that would go un-marched to — all the crapped-on floors — the un-wrapped fish — the un-lined bird cages — oh, the chaos !! For the love of Pete, Nanny, BE STILL girl !!

  7. Marshall_Will on October 18th, 2010 2:26 pm

    Rick,

    LOL, never could figure that out? Let's assume he/they will be in heaven 'forever' ( is 77 virgins really gonna' hold a guy over? ) I mean Eternity is a looong time. And… once you've slept w/ them -once- … what becomes of 'them'? What if you happen to fall in love w/ the 1st one!? Is having 76 OTHER women hating your guts on a daily basis really worth it?

    As to virgin s@x I think Rodney Dangerfield said it right: "The first time I had sex, it was dark, I was afraid.., I was ALONE!" Kidding aside, I think I get the jihadi-jist of it ( Women = Disposable ) or am I reading that all wrong?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.