Apr
8
We’ll Keep Our Boehner Out of Your Vaginas if You Keep Your Hands Out of Our Wallets… Deal?
Filed Under Abortion, Politics | 13 Comments
It only figures that because the budget battle has focused so much on Planned Parenthood funding that the NARAL crowd has been drawn out in full force:

Here’s my question… NARAL stands for National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League. “Abortion” is right there in their title, so it’s obvious what they focus on. I’ve had telling me in my email today that “federal law prohibits tax dollars from going to performing abortions… the money that PP gets goes to other services!” Okay… then why are “abortion rights” people freaking about defunding something they say PP gets no money for?
The fact is that money to Planned Parenthood is money to Planned Parenthood. If our tax dollars help meet the bottom line on one side of their business they’ve got extra resources for another side of their business. So yes, taxpayers do help subsidize abortions. Planned Parenthood knows it, NARAL knows it, Harry Reid knows it, Nancy Pelosi knows it and Barbara Boxer knows it. That’s why they’re freaking out so much over it.
Does anybody really believe Dems are going crazy over pulling money for Planned Parenthood to perform women’s cancer screenings that are already covered by the Obamacare law? This is about abortions, no matter what Harry Reid says.
If they cared so much about women the first thing they’d do is stop killing hundreds of thousands of them a year in their beloved abortion clinics.
Update: A deal has been announced that will avoid a shutdown, at least for now. What happened with the Planned Parenthood funding? Is Boehner in or out of NARAL’s vagina? We’ll find out soon enough.
Comments
13 Responses to “We’ll Keep Our Boehner Out of Your Vaginas if You Keep Your Hands Out of Our Wallets… Deal?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

From that pic, what they should really fear is prohibition. Should that ever occur again, abortion would be the last thing they would have to worry about.
That or a paper bag shortage !
Conservative women are just ssoooo much more attractive in all aspects than libtards !
It starts from the insides!
i would seriously hope cantor & boehner DO NOT cave on this issue. a majority of americans are supportive of this stance. support the troops and save babies. what is so damn tough about this choice????????? how come the left NEVER gives in on abortion but the “right” does? first f’n Stupak and now boehner/cantor.
wtf?????
You know, I'd love to see someone introduce what I like to call the "Her Body, Her Choice, Her Tab" Act — cutting off all government funds for abortion and birth control, as well as declaring that no man shall be held liable for child support unless he signs the birth certificate within 732 hours of a child's birth.
What ? swede is MIA ?
When I mentioned you being MIA, he mentioned maybe you found life beyond the internet, which I read as his wife was on his behind. Trust he'll be back. His logic is sound.
My MIA-ness was purely a failed hard drive issue. As for life beyond the internet, those 2 weeks were filled with drives on the Blue Ridge Parkway and thru the Great Smoky Mtns. N.P. with my camera. A little early for many flowers but the views were still nice. No wife to be on my behind since `91. She was unfaithful anyway !
Maybe swede`s MIA-ness is also `puter related, or maybe working at his own site ! I hope nothing serious !
How do liberals constantly and consistantly get the most unattractive women on the planet all in one place?
It's uncanny, ain't it?
[...] Doug Powers – The Powers That Be – [...]
Perhaps "I just loves me the camera Schumer" was talking about these libtards when talking about "fleas on a dog".
Kind of off topic but…. it appears Tiger Woods has found himself a few new skanks to screw. His performance yesterday was "on par" with other tournaments when he was porkin' his harem of wanna-be porn stars.
That`s a whole lotta ego to fit in that little head !