Yet another administration official providing weak cover for something that’s going to be wildly expensive. This is more BS than you could ever see or smell at the rodeo.

From CNS News:

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told a House panel Thursday that a reduction in the number of human beings born in the United States will compensate employers and insurers for the cost of complying with the new HHS mandate that will require all health-care plans to cover sterilizations and all FDA-approved contraceptives, including those that cause abortions.

“The reduction in the number of pregnancies compensates for the cost of contraception,” Sebelius said. She went on to say the estimated cost is “down not up.”

As with everything else these people say, this makes zero sense.

The Obama administration always tells us insurance companies are greedy bastards — right? Which is to say they’re only concerned about saving money. If giving out “free” contraceptives equates to fewer human beings, and fewer human beings equates to cost savings, why aren’t health insurance companies across-the-board offering “free” contraceptives already? Or does Kathleen Sebelius believe she’s so f*#@%ing intelligent that she thought of something a million private-sector actuaries overlooked?

If this mandate is allowed to stand, there will be some serious backfire, naturally. Contraceptives are relatively cheap (or even free in many areas), and the government getting further involved via Obamacare will drive up the price. Obama’s doofy minions won’t care because “the government is paying for it,” and everybody else will be stuck with something that used to be cheap but became more expensive and is adding to the already out of control national debt. Then when Obamacare inevitably collapses under its own weight, people will be stuck having to buy their own contraceptives again, except they’ll cost more than before — a stark reminder to future generations of Team Obama’s effort to “help” humanity.

Ever notice that the left’s answer to save money is always “fewer people” — unless we’re talking about the size of government.

By the way, the Obamacare cost just rose $111 billion. Why? Because that’s a sign that health care is being made cheaper or something.


14 Responses to “Kathleen Sebelius: The Contraceptive Mandate Will Pay For Itself Via Reduction in Number of Human Beings”

  1. clu seatoe on March 2nd, 2012 7:05 pm

    Such people belong in institutions for the criminally insane. It’s a walk down the stepping stone path to force sterilization of those not of the “Master Race” all over again.

  2. SignPainterGuy on March 2nd, 2012 7:21 pm

    Sebelius is a member of the population control cabal. Anything to lower the human count; except of course as Doug said, when they are government workers !

    When the libs want more people paying more taxes AND more people on the giverment dole, and insurance cos. want more people buying policies and paying premiums, what sense does it make to try to reduce the number of people ?

    It is indeed a bizarro, opposite world !

  3. SignPainterGuy on March 2nd, 2012 7:25 pm

    Right you are ! This is precisely what population control, abortion rights, Planned Parenthood and the banning of DDT is all about ! Ridding the world of every black person possible and people who are physically or mentally or politically imperfect !

  4. Jimbo on March 2nd, 2012 7:32 pm

    Goodbye, future human beings. Goodbye, future tax revenue.

    Liberals can't think past next week.

  5. SignPainterGuy on March 2nd, 2012 7:33 pm

    My first thought; "Oooo, that far, huh ?"

  6. swede on March 2nd, 2012 8:02 pm

    Sabelius looks and talks exactly like my grade school principal – but she makes Mrs "Butthead" Butler look like a saint.

  7. SignPainterGuy on March 2nd, 2012 8:18 pm

    Sometimes those nicknames are just too easy; my HS Principal was "Saltman" Morton. It was REAL easy to get too much of him ! ;-)

  8. SignPainterGuy on March 2nd, 2012 9:05 pm

    O/T; So sad …. and "unexpected"……….

    Those poor, ultra-sensitive government subsidized UAW workers can`t stand that the Re-Volt has become a political punching bag !

    Fascinating that the Dolt is advertised as an "Extended-Mileage Hybrid" vehicle. I read recently that tests showed the car ran out of juice twice at about 29 miles …. in a tunnel. Isn`t that a wee bit less than the initial claim of over 70 miles per charge ?

    The story makes the claim that production will be halted to "keep up with demand". Excuse me, but don`t you halt production because of a "lack of" demand ? In essence, they have "OVER- produced" a product few people want !

    And to add insult to injury, the UAW is laying off UAW workers. Oh, the ironic irony !

  9. Joe Redfield on March 2nd, 2012 10:55 pm

    By how much do we have to lower the population before there aren't enough people left to pay off the enormous national debt we are still accruing?

  10. clu seatoe on March 2nd, 2012 11:19 pm

    No population cull is needed. By numbers we’re already there so as it was in Medieval times those who hold the debts will be granted hereditary titles to lands throughout the realm. As the quote from Mel Gibson’s, THE PATRIOT goes:

    “Tell me about Ohio”.

  11. Dandapani on March 2nd, 2012 11:46 pm

    You know what else saves money. Not treating sick people and letting them die. Not helping old people extend their lives. Just think of the money saved.

  12. ChapBix on March 5th, 2012 11:55 am

    DP: This is more BS than you could ever see or smell at the rodeo.

    Or in a stockyard.

    PP began as an effort to rid the world of inferior beings as determined by Margaret Sanger. Flash to the future: those deemed expedient by the left is anyone on the right opposing them. It would seem reasonable to extend that to a child potentially born to someone on the right who would be part of the cadre opposing the left. Like King Herod, the left seeks to rid the world of anyone who would supplant them. Evidence? Their vicious rhetoric and actions.

  13. blogc2011 on December 6th, 2012 6:57 am

    When the libs want more people paying more taxes AND more people on the giverment dole, and insurance cos. want more people buying policies and paying premiums, what sense does it make to try to reduce the number of people ? ????

  14. imoforpcs on May 2nd, 2017 3:36 pm

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.