null

The title of this post was for dramatic effect only — in reality I think Jill could kick his ass.

From the Daily Caller:

Vice President Joe Biden suggested on Wednesday that the GOP’s opposition to the Democratic version of a domestic violence bill will give the green light to male violence against women.

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) was passed in 1994 and was reauthorized in 2005. Approval of an updated law is stalled because Republican and Democratic senators disagree over what provisions should be added to the law.

“Just ask yourself, what message does it send to our daughters, to every women imprisoned in their own homes … if the law is not reauthorized,” Biden declared today at a White House meeting of feminists and groups that are funded by the law.

Social opposition to male abuse of women “became part of our social fabric, our social culture,” because of the 1994 law, Biden said. ”Just imagine the impact on the moral disapprobation of society if this Congress refuses to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act.”

Poor ol’ Sheriff Joe still thinks morality comes from legislation.

But what do I know? I’m just a wife-beating white male. Here’s Phyllis Schlafly’s take on the VAWA:

For 30 years, the feminists have been pretending that their goal is to abolish all sex discrimination, eliminating all gender differences no matter how reasonable. When it comes to domestic violence, however, feminist dogma preaches that there is an innate gender difference: Men are naturally batterers, and women are naturally victims (i.e., gender profiling).

Starting with its title, VAWA is just about as sex discriminatory as legislation can get. It is written and implemented to oppose the abuse of women and to punish men.

Ignoring the mountain of evidence that women initiate physical violence nearly as often as men, VAWA has more than 60 passages in its lengthy text that exclude men from its benefits. For starters, the law’s title should be changed to Partner Violence Reduction Act, and the words “and men” should be added to those 60 sections.

The law should be rewritten to deal with the tremendous problem of false accusations so that its priority can be to help real victims. A Centers for Disease Control survey found that half of all partner violence was mutual, and 282 scholarly studies reported that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men.

Currently used definitions of domestic violence that are unacceptably trivial include calling your partner a naughty word, raising your voice, causing “annoyance” or “emotional distress,” or just not doing what your partner wants. The law’s revision should use an accurate definition of domestic violence that includes violence, such as: “any act or threatened act of violence, including any forceful detention of an individual, which results or threatens to result in physical injury.”

Women who make domestic violence accusations are not required to produce evidence and are never prosecuted for perjury if they lie. Accused men are not accorded fundamental protections of due process, not considered innocent until proven guilty and in many cases are not afforded the right to confront their accusers.

Legal assistance is customarily provided to women but not to men. Men ought to be entitled to equal protection of the law because many charges are felonies and could result in prison and loss of money, job and reputation.

The VAWA is discriminatory as hell. No wonder Barbara “ma’am” Boxer likes it so much.

Odd though how these self-proclaimed champions of women can then turn around and fully justify throwing over a half million females a year in the trash can.

Comments

17 Responses to “Joe Biden: Reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act or I Just Might Beat the Sh*t Out of My Wife”

  1. Joe Redfield on April 19th, 2012 6:41 pm

    I suppose if this doesn't pass tomorrow women will have to go back on the Endangered Species list next week. The main reason this passed back in 1994 was that someone told Bubba there would be a shortage of interns otherwise.

  2. backwoodsconsr on April 19th, 2012 6:48 pm

    Jill may be able to kick Joe's ass but I'll bet she can't out talk him.

  3. SignPainterGuy on April 19th, 2012 7:38 pm

    By "out talk", do you mean words per minute or actually make sense ? Surely she`s the brighter of the two, much like Mary Matalin and James Carville !

  4. SignPainterGuy on April 19th, 2012 7:50 pm

    My circle of friends has long referred to the white tank top tee as a "wife beater tee"; look at how many wife-beaters are portrayed and actually arrested / pictured in white tank top tees !

    Yes, men should be written in to this law and for the reasons given; men are often the victims !

    Very importantly, the common practice of muslim family beatings and worse should also be expressly illegal in the USA and punishable by some very stiff penalties !

  5. Truesoldier__ on April 19th, 2012 8:27 pm

    I don't know, I think Jill could out talk him as well….considering that Biden always seems to have his foot shoved in his mouth.

  6. SignPainterGuy on April 19th, 2012 8:46 pm

    In the late `70s, I asked that about Pro Wrestling; it is so obviously fake and rehearsed ! I concluded it is the fans ! I was also shocked to learn that pro-wrestling was at that time the only thing that would fill up Madison Square Garden !

  7. Marshall_Will on April 19th, 2012 10:03 pm

    I happen to disagree. The Violence Against Women Act IS good legislation and all Males suspected of domestic battering/abuse should be prosecuted to the full extent of the Law. ( Well.., except for this guy? )

    "his ex-girlfriend, a Brazilian soap opera star named Adriana Ferreyr (You can check out her IMDB page here.) Ferreyr, shown here on a trip with Soros last December, has filed a $50 million lawsuit against her ex, alleging that he *slapped and choked* her while the two argued about an apartment he’d promised her on Manhattan’s Upper East Side.

    According to the suit, Sorors dumped Ferreryr after five years of dating. The two then reconciled briefly, at which point Soros leaned over to Ferreyr while in bed and whispered that he’d given the apartment he’d promised her on 30 E. 85th St. to another woman. And that’s when, the actress alleges, the proverbial dookie hit the proverbial fan. She says Soros proceeded to *slap her and *choke her. Then, he allegedly tried to hit her with a glass lamp, which ended up breaking on the floor and cutting her foot, resulting in three stitches.

    Police were called, but no charges were filed. ( Slapped & Choked, that's just like Hope & Change right? )

  8. ChapBix on April 20th, 2012 2:22 am

    Perhaps voters should see the discriminatory language contained in VAWA in an ad this fall? Run it in districts and states where Dems are leading in the polls and show who is currently supporting VAWA in its current form.

  9. jeffythequick on April 20th, 2012 12:44 pm

    How does he get his foot in his mouth with his head shoved up his a… posterior?

  10. jeffythequick on April 20th, 2012 12:56 pm

    And show one woman beaten in a two woman relationship not being able to get justice for the crime against her under this act.

  11. SignPainterGuy on April 20th, 2012 1:19 pm

    Quite a pretzel move !

  12. SignPainterGuy on April 20th, 2012 1:22 pm

    Or the male victim in a two-man relationship !

  13. jeffythequick on April 20th, 2012 6:44 pm

    I'd say, "Man up"

  14. jeffythequick on April 20th, 2012 6:51 pm

    I enjoy the physical mastery and choreography they have to put on that kind of show, though.

  15. jeffythequick on April 20th, 2012 6:56 pm

    By the things he says, he is quite a contortionist.

  16. SignPainterGuy on April 20th, 2012 9:20 pm

    Too many men already !

  17. John Foreman on May 7th, 2012 3:21 pm

    This law according to judges trumps over all laws. That is why it is so damaging and dangerous. If you are a women and getting a divorce all you have to do is claim fear, the man loses his house, kids, and has to pay extra child support. This is why women now use this lie in court all the time. Judge Judy seems to caught on about the abuse of the system to men. I can tell you the truth because I witness this from my daughter in law that was living with me. She even practiced on videos pretending to be a victim, got a free lawyer from the YWCA and now the gov. has to entitle her to section 8 housing, food, disability and so on. This law is just another entitlement with grave consequences to children not being able to see their fathers because it puts restraining orders on men that now have to pay 30 to 50 dollars an hour to see their kids. This a nazi evil law and it is increasing men to just become violent and they should as the women steal thier kids and wallets.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.