Aug

24

Whose ‘War on Women™,’ Sen. McCaskill?

Filed Under Politics | 11 Comments

Missouri’s Claire McCaskill is of course taking advantage of Todd Akin’s fit of idiocy, and the Democrats are using Akin for a fresh push on the tired “Republican War on Women™” meme.

Democrats are also thrilled that Bill Clinton is on board with their efforts to re-elect Obama. Bubba has even recorded an ad for Obama.

With that in mind, bringing this “War on Women™” thing full circle is Claire McCaskill, circa 2006, who said she wouldn’t let Clinton anywhere near her daughter:

Having Bill Clinton as one of your front men when you’re going after the other party for a “War on Women™” is like recruiting Michael Moore to lead your effort to convince people your opponents are fat-asses.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled Republican War on Women!

(h/t Dana Loesch)

Comments

11 Responses to “Whose ‘War on Women™,’ Sen. McCaskill?”

  1. Marshall_Will on August 24th, 2012 6:11 pm

    Without in any way water carryin' for Akin, I'm now of the opinion.., holding our breath, closing our EYES and taking our best t-ball league SWING isn't going to cut it!

    We went thru this w/ Christine O'Donnell in MD. Michelle made comment before it was revealed C.O was a "practicing witch" that "she isn't the 'perfect' candidate". And we survived. Mistakes ARE going to be made. Hell, I'VE made mistakes. We all have…

    But it would be a colossal MISTAKE to become timid and commence w/ the walking of eggshells w/ this much to go. Learn from them and move forward. That is all…

  2. backwoodsconsr on August 24th, 2012 6:39 pm

    If Bill Clinton were asked, I'm sure he would say, "I'm not going to declare war on women. I love women. Here, have a cigar!"

  3. backwoodsconsr on August 24th, 2012 9:43 pm

    You admit to making mistakes? Man, you'd never make it as a Democrat politician.

  4. ChapBix on August 24th, 2012 9:51 pm

    "Just be sure to put some ice on that."

  5. Marshall_Will on August 24th, 2012 10:48 pm

    Yep! Never cut it.

    As Conservatives, the overwhelming BRUNT of our errors lie in the fact we even attempted to "reach out and work with" radical, HARDLINE, hopelessly devoted/talking points [addicted] Prog's to BEGIN with!

    We've since learned when dealing with the Kamp Alinsky Kids, kindness is ALWAYS mistaken for 'weakness', words mean whatever they WANT them to mean and there's nothing SO SIMPLE, so rudimentary they can't fashion it into a dagger and plant -squarely- between your shoulder blades.

    A mistake of sorely misplace trust, flailing for an imaginary "social bond" as Americans that hasn't existed where they're concerned for 30 years. Be it nationally, at work, in our own HOMES.

  6. ChapBix on August 24th, 2012 10:49 pm

    So, the Republicans are carrying out a war on women? Which party's platform contains a plank in full support of abortion of females throughout a pregnancy? Which party has steadfastly refused to ban partial birth abortions of females? Which party has blocked efforts to regulate and inspect abortion facilities for basic safety considerations? Which member, as an IL Senator, spoke and voted against the infant female Born Alive Protection Act?

    Now, which party has had a plank in its platform to protect life in the womb, including the lives of future women?

    Tell me again, which party has waged a war on women? Claire McCaskill, how did you vote on this issue? (That was a rhetorical question.)

  7. SignPainterGuy on August 24th, 2012 11:05 pm

    But, Romney`s tax returns, George Bush and WMDs, Cheney can`t shoot …… SQUIRREL !!

  8. Pasadena Phil on August 25th, 2012 12:38 am

    Looks like those seven dots are going to be with us for a while. Maybe you could put a crossword puzzle in there. Seems like wasted space and we are all trying to conserve resources these days.

  9. jeffythequick on August 25th, 2012 1:00 am

    No pixels were hurt in making this web page.

  10. A.Men on August 25th, 2012 11:44 am

    John Edwards cheated on his cancerous wife, Spitzer cheated on his wife with prostitutes, Bill Clinton cheated on Hilary with everyone. Kennedy cheated on his wife and killed his lover by driving off the bridge and not calling for help until after contacting his lawyer. JFK cheated on Jackie with interns, movie stars, Russian spies, well — anyone near him.

    Sounds like the Dimocraps have the WAR on WOMEN!

    Throw out all Dem congresswomen! Romney/Ryan 2012!

  11. dylan terreri, i on August 25th, 2012 1:40 pm

    to whom it may concern regarding "the war on women":

    as the webmaster of http://www.ladiessavetheday.com, i am hearing everyone talking about "the war on women" and i ask myself what women could be complaining about. are they mad at God for designing females to lay an egg if a man hasn't had his way with them sexually? are they mad at God for designing femininity to be used as a tool by men? are they mad that their milk jugs are a tool to be used by babies?

    are they complaining about being regarded as and known as members of the lesser gender? i would assume so, with all of this "a woman can do anything a man can do" nonsense. they obviously cannot accept that they are of the lesser gender, being that "Strongwoman" is the new buzz-word (while men have been reduced to being known as "guys," even as the Strongwoman isn't half as strong as a man who can pick her up and throw her before he pulls a george huguely and kills her without help from a weapon other than his own masculine ability).

    the truth is that Strongwoman doesn't have a body built for strength, she doesn't have testosterone to give her strength. case-in-point: for a sense of gender-equality, she relies on gender-based sports teams and gender-based military requirements because she can only triumph alongside of men (and never over men). she is meant to be picked on because the Strongwoman is largely disabled.

    a woman is as defined by her womb as the word "woman" is a product of "womb" and "man". case-in-point: Strongwoman bleeds for a man. case-in-point: while laying an egg from her womb every month, Strongwoman bleeds actual blood because a man hasn't fertilized the egg. despite the tell-tale vagina, though, Strongwoman bleeds to be manly mostly every day of the month. when she's laying an egg, she just accepts it and she doesn't take any hints about gender-roles – rather, she sticks to her reality-defying mantra: "a woman can do anything a man can do".

    as all wombn bleed for men, all wombn are of the lesser gender. i cannot understand why society embraces physical competitions being based on gender (olympic swimming, scholastic basketball) while they buy into the "anything a man can do" mantra. maybe i can understand basketball being gender-based, as men are members of the taller gender, but i wonder why society separates the men from the girls in every other sporting event/physical competition.

    if gender-based physical competitions and the size of the barbells at "curves fitness" aren't a constant reminder of the reality of gender-inequality, if neither the presence of females' milk-jugs or the reality of females laying an egg every month isn't a constant reminder of gender-roles, then i'm sure that wombn are blind and therefore i have no problem with "handicapped parking" doubling as "parking for pregnant women".

    u2 said "love is blindness," but i maintain that "womanhood is blindness".

    must i bring up how the "coney island hot dog eating competition" just added a "women' division" – they can't even eat like a man.

    dylan terreri, i http://www.jaggedlittledyl.com/essays

    is it a "war on women" or is she a "moron woman"

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.