Sep
14
Obama 2007: The day I’m inaugurated the Muslim world will be less hostile toward America
Filed Under Politics, Religion | 13 Comments
Flashback to a more delusional time.
How’s that working out?

The problem with the philosophy (or lack thereof) of Obama and his ilk has been highlighted this week in bold. For example, they expect us to believe the uprising du jour is actually about some movie — right up to the point of asking YouTube to consider removing it. In other words, the Obama administration is acting as a censorship arm for Islamic extremists.
If the problem is the movie that was recently put out, then what was the problem last month… or the month before… or the month before… or on 9/11? Things like that movie aren’t causes of murderous uprisings, they’re merely excuses for them. To see our own government legitimizing that is nauseating, not to mention dangerous.
Violence is on the rise because those who hate America and what it stands for sense weakness, and unfortunately their senses seem to be in excellent working condition.
Hopefully the president can find solutions to these mounting global and domestic problems at another fundraiser tonight.
By the way, there was no high level security protection for our people in Libya who were killed, but you’ll be happy to know that Valerie Jarrett is being guarded 24/7 by Secret Service agents during her Martha’s Vineyard vacation. You know… in case there’s an uprising at the Beach Plum.
Comments
13 Responses to “Obama 2007: The day I’m inaugurated the Muslim world will be less hostile toward America”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

And Ozero's chickens – come home to roost!!!
From here on out – including the four that were killed Libiya – any and all Americans killed by extremists and thugs – their blood is on his hands. Appeasement gets you no where – when all they want to do is kill Americans.
At this rate Ozero is starting to make Carter look statesman-like.
H. Clinton:
ATTACKS ARE SENSELESS AND UNACCEPTABLE
Blah, blah, blah. UNACCEPTABLE?? What are you going to do about it?
OK, you islamophile human rights respecters now step across this line, now step across this line, now step across this line, now step across…. Blah, blah, blah
OK, now knock this piece of wood off my shoulder, now knock THIS piece of wood off my shoulder, now knock THIS piece of wood off my shoulder, now knock THIS piece…. Blah, blah, blah
http://video.foxnews.com/v/1841287151001/
Surely the UN Security Council has a stockpile of an assortment of tersely written letters it can fire off to …. to …. uh, who`s in charge of all this rioting anyway ?
Yeah, how are we to COEXIST with someone who wants to kill us ?
Barry and Shrillary and others absolutely have blood on their hands !
I saw the numbers today; less than 500 under Bush, but in 3 1/2 years under Obama, nearly 1,500 Americans have been killed in Afghanistan !
“…who`s in charge of all this rioting anyway ?”
You can place it all on the empty chair.
I wasn`t really meaning "blame"; that falls on the koran and the radical imams and clerics AND yes, the Empty Chair for his weakness n stuff.
Who would the UNSC send their scary ol` letter(s) to ? Al Qeada …. the MB ….. a few nation`s leaders ?
I know it`s just a joke I`m trying to put a touch of the real to, but all I hear is the UN being laughed at ! and Obama !
The UN IS the joke. The only ones that take them seriously are themselves. And then I’m not even sure of that. They’ve latched themselves on to the leaky teat of the rich Uncle Sam and have been there for so long they’ve become permanently attached like a grafted in limb.
The other international joke is Clinton’s and Zero’s foreign policy of:
OK, I’m gonna count to three. OK, this time I mean it. OK, this time I really mean it. OK, this time I really, really mean it. OK, OK, OK,…..
OK, we know that islamic supremacism is to blame, but Obama, Clintoon and the UN deny it, so there`s no place in the world to send their tersely written letters ! There`s no one who will accept responsibility ! It`s someone else`s fault !
I finally understand why all of your people love Mitt Romney so much. You are all just too ignorant to know any better
And if you actually SPOKE the truth, you wouldn`t have to tell anyone !
He's a Democrat. He defines truth differently, just as liberals have found alternate meanings for other words, such as "gay" and "progressive".
This is the exact blog for anyone who desires to admit in this vicinity this theme. You admit so greatly its extremely near tough to contend with you (not with the intention of I really would aspire…HaHa). You beyond disbelief place a new spin on a theme thats been on paper in this vicinity for being. Splendid material, only splendid! bestessays au reviews