Later this week, Sheriff Joe Biden is expected to make recommendations to the president as what steps can be taken, in Plugs’ mind anyway, that will reduce gun violence. The White House is reportedly eyeing 19 suggested executive actions, including giving the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention authority on guns (which could come in handy when it comes to suggestions on how to keep my rifle from getting the flu).

Why doesn’t Obama just issue a presidential proclamation calling for all those in favor of gun control — especially the ones in the media who love giving out the names and addresses of people registered to own guns — to put a sign in their yards declaring “this home is proudly gun free” as a way of helping show where the guns aren’t? After all, if no guns makes a place much safer, who would have a problem putting a sign out declaring their home a secure area?

As The Project Veritas demonstrates, that’s an idea that won’t catch on:

There’s a lesson to be taken from things like this, but it’s too bad that it flies over the heads of much of the left.


36 Responses to “Pro Gun Control Media Asked to Put ‘This Home is Proudly Gun Free’ Signs in their Yards, Hilarity Ensues”

  1. Dexter_Alarius on January 15th, 2013 4:13 pm

    This video is hilarious.

    They should have also offered T-Shirts, Hats and Jackets that proclaim in large neon letters: Proudly Unarmed!

  2. Truesoldier__ on January 15th, 2013 4:35 pm

    That was too funny. Got to love how some of them tried to use armed guards or the police to intimidate people they claim they agree with…lol.

  3. jeffythequick on January 15th, 2013 4:35 pm

    This is the same crowd that says that we can't deport 20,000,000 people here illegally, but we can get rid of 300,000,000 guns that are legal.

    That's right. Because people that follow the law, follow the law.

  4. jeffythequick on January 15th, 2013 4:37 pm

    Another observation… Have you notice the OWS crowd has quieted down after the election?

    Odd, indeed.

  5. Dexter_Alarius on January 15th, 2013 5:25 pm

    Haven't heard much from Code Pink since 2008.
    Hey, isn't the war still on?

  6. backwoodsconsr on January 15th, 2013 6:12 pm

    Yes, but now it's being run by Democrats, so it's okay.

  7. Truesoldier__ on January 15th, 2013 6:13 pm

    Or here is a great link to a story regarding a Human Rights Watch member and her stance on GITMO during Bush and now with dear leader in office:

  8. JetHeadJoe on January 15th, 2013 6:39 pm

    ,,,,hilarity ensues. For a moment, I thought I was reading FARK (your dog wants steak). Perhaps we should all wear target shirts. What are the odds that you can buy one at Target? 5% chance?

  9. backwoodsconsr on January 15th, 2013 7:13 pm

    Obviously, those people have the cowardice of their convictions.

  10. SignPainterGuy on January 15th, 2013 8:03 pm

    Their cowardice far outweighs their convictions !

  11. SignPainterGuy on January 15th, 2013 8:07 pm

    PV`s counting was way off; they didn`t credit nearly enough sign rejections. I would characterize most every one of the interviews as a rejection.

    At the end, the man described "the right-wing" taking control and causing a revolution, typical of the left`s Opposite World View.

  12. backwoodsconsr on January 15th, 2013 8:15 pm

    Yeah, they were counting as door slams a lot of people who clearly said they didn't want a sign.

  13. Truesoldier__ on January 15th, 2013 8:25 pm

    No kidding. It just goes to show the mentality of the left. In their mind, the world would be just peachy if us pesky Conservatives would just drop dead.

  14. jeffythequick on January 15th, 2013 9:40 pm

    and with their mantra of violence and deception, they'll help speed along the process.

  15. Marshall_Will on January 15th, 2013 11:34 pm

    SPG mentioned ( earlier in the hilarity ensuings ) that essentially it's not so much the 'guns' that Progressives object to; rather that likely as not ( there's a Conservative at the other end of it! )

    More hilarity; notice how these folks ALL resided in upscale, all White neighborhoods..! Surely there's places within the NYC metro area where minorities are in the majority they'd be perfectly comfortable and PROUD to sport their Gun Free Home! sign..?

    Thought not.

  16. Marshall_Will on January 15th, 2013 11:46 pm


    Really interesting read on a tectonic SHIFT in WA State House. The less "Seattle-centric" the BETTER 'I' say..! And more proof of course BHO didn't take the PNW, IMHO.

  17. Marshall_Will on January 15th, 2013 11:52 pm

    Oh.., and JFTR, 'I' see no reason that a minority n'hood should necessarily come hand in glove w/ violence or GUN violence for that matter? In fact if you drive around some black n'hoods in Chicago during the dead of winter ( when it's so cold no one in their right MIND would be outdoors a *second* longer than is required ) you'd never GUESS they were black areas!

    Neat as a pin homes, immaculately kept and not a SHRED of litter, let alone roving [armed] gangs. What up dudes..?

  18. SignPainterGuy on January 16th, 2013 1:02 am

    That "guns" thing (I like your phrase-iation, btw) was from the PRAVDA, "Don`t Give Up Your Guns" article.

  19. SignPainterGuy on January 16th, 2013 1:12 am

    In my travels to MI following the motorcycle racing, we took a lot of back-ish roads to miss scales and saw lots of neighborhoods. Once you get north of Lexington, KY and especially north of Indianapolis, IN ALL the homes are well kept, toys n stuff put away, NO junque or trash !

  20. Pro Gun Control Media Asked to Put ‘This Home is Proudly Gun Free’ Signs in their Yards, Hilarity Ensues | Are We Aware Yet? Political News Blog-Current News Political News Blog on January 16th, 2013 12:54 pm

    [...] The Powers That Be [...]

  21. Truesoldier__ on January 16th, 2013 1:41 pm

    Now that Coumo has made NY safer from gun violence I guess he needs to start working up a lather over bat and tire iron control:

  22. Truesoldier__ on January 16th, 2013 1:53 pm

    Yep, I mentioned this shortly after the election when I first heard about the new "bipartisan" majority. Tim Sheldon really is a true blue dog Democrat (or as we like to call them here in WA ST a Scoop Jackson Democrat). Very fisaclly COnservative (he has voted aginst the majority of taxes and spending his own party has put forward). Right now, the majority of people in the state are more worried about fiscal issues than social issues, so I agree with the article that this could have a long term benefit for the GOP here in WA ST. If the cards are played right (and knowing the current GOP chairman they will be) the GOP can show that they can work with members of the opposing party on true budget reforms. This also means the Seattle Centric members of the Legislature can no longer ignore the GOP as they will now have to work with them.

  23. Truesoldier__ on January 16th, 2013 1:53 pm

    And to be honest, this couldn't have come at a better time. Last year, the Democrat lead Legislature commisioned the DoT to do a study to see how to either replace or supplement the gas tax with a per mile tax. They were looking at whether to have odometer readings, GPS systems to track miles or a year permit to use the roads (which I thought we already had via licensing, but I digress). With the new coalition in the Senate this is going to be stopped in its tracks.

  24. Marshall_Will on January 16th, 2013 2:14 pm

    That's what made the entire charade of ( oh GAWD… ) "coat tailing" the legalizing of pot onto non-existent Obie faux-mentum.

    "Better get this passed and passed QUICK before some "moral majority" storms in and starts telling us we can't have Kummar intercourse w/ the weed of our choosing!?"

    It wasn't even ON the radar! Nor was ghey marriage for that matter? Ram rodding it onto the ballot was brazen in itself, crafting them and declaring victory quite another. Support for both will be every bit as adamant as Inauguration attendance…

  25. Truesoldier__ on January 16th, 2013 2:23 pm

    Speaking of pot legalization, the state still has no idea how they are going to do it. They are still trying to come up with a way to implement the distribution part of the law. They have been given the wink and nod from Obama that he wont go after them for doing it, but even officials in this state are heistant to believe anything he says and want it officially put in writing (which sources have told me Obama has refused to do).

    My guess is he will let it go for now, but as soon as there is any kind of violence or what not he will use it to further his ambitions which is to destroy the Constution and Bill of Rights one by one. I could see him going after the 4th, 5th and 10th ammendments in the case of the pot laws.

  26. Marshall_Will on January 16th, 2013 2:34 pm


    In that regard, WA isn't 'special'. Hearing the same in CO and the handful of States that ate the brownies. NOW what!? Put stoners in charge and what do we expect?

    Anything that enables Crashing The System gets fast tracked. Choom would be no exception. So let's usurp away and stand the Constitution on its ear for the 5% of the pop. that refuses to grow up! And again, where are all the Boomers on this one? I'm doubting those staring down the barrel of underwater home values, decimated 401k's and diminished hopes for even a 'comfortable' retirement had the luxury of entertaining this as a 'priority'? IMHO

  27. Truesoldier__ on January 16th, 2013 2:53 pm

    So very true. Speaking of fear tactics. You should see the latest in the DoD Civilian workforce. They are now telling DoD employees (not military, just the civilian workforce) that if the sequestration cuts were to happen it would mean furlouging the entire nearly 800,000 DoD civilians for a month to cover the costs in the cuts to the DoD that are in regards to DoD personel, so we all better start calling Congress and telling them that this can't happen.

    Of course they fail to mention that the month means a total of about 22 days per person over the course of 7 months so about 3 days per month. Instead they try to make it sound like you would be out of a job for a month straight to scare people (and it is working).

    Not to mention, with how bloated the DoD Civlian workforce is they could stand to cut it down drastically via layoffs. God knows there are two in my department that if we got rid of would actually streamline our workload as everyone has to go back and redo the work they did.

  28. SignPainterGuy on January 16th, 2013 3:04 pm

    Are you aware of the "layoffs" being considered across the board or concentrating on the "less essential personnel" ?

  29. Truesoldier__ on January 16th, 2013 3:10 pm

    That's just it they are not even talking about layoffs, only across the board furloughs. It would make more sense to lay off non-essential personnel and dead weight, but that is not even being discussed.

  30. Marshall_Will on January 16th, 2013 3:18 pm


    Bring.It.On! Oh and beat us w/ a wet noodle while you're at it? SPEAKING of which..!?:

    Toying with a new idea that just might put an END to pResident Brinksmanship! Coordinate thru the Tea Party to have a National Bills Holiday. Give people a handful of paydays to stock up on necessities and then say;

    "What are the damages? What is MY share of The Bill!? I will forego making my mortgage payments, car payments and even utilities to get you TF off our BACKS. Throw a number out there!"

    It hits all of O'Drama's cronies right where they live! Primarily the Banks. Screw them, they already threw us under the bus. We'll even keep our kids home from school so you can just go ahead and furlough those teachers for as looong as it takes to get us back on track!

  31. Truesoldier__ on January 16th, 2013 3:38 pm

    Sounds like a plan. Like I have said in the past we need to be looking everywhere within governement spending to cut. There are no "sacred cows" that are "to important to cut" imo and that includes the DoD. There is so much dead weight out there, but it continues to fester like a cancer unabated, because the bureaucracy has made it nearly impossible to get rid of those who are just collecting a pay check. I like to call them governement employed welfare recipients.

  32. Truesoldier__ on January 16th, 2013 3:56 pm

    Wow, here is one honest Democrat Senator:

    Sen Joe Manchin says media will show pictures of dead children to try to sway votes for gun control.

  33. Marshall_Will on January 16th, 2013 4:00 pm


    The sheer amount of counter productive JOCKEYING going on just prior to retirement from Active Duty to secure those all important ( and ridiculously overpaid ) GS positions is not to be believed..!

    We recently had a Change of Command ceremony and I told my immediate Sup. "this one was my LAST". We cycled somebody thru as C.O that had hardly been a YEAR? Thankfully he minded his own business for the most part.

    AFAICT these have become some sort of "musical commands" to where everyone takes turns just to get it on their resume and a shot at a star. Those that don't get their turn wind up going bitter on their own Dept's. It's all YOUR fault..?

    We have an E-8 that constantly whines about not having been advanced to E-9. Insofar as I've seen, all he does it set up for parties, promotions etc. Now he'd demanding a transfer so he can't be "held back" any longer! I think back and when I was on a carrier we had (1) E-9. The Command Master Chief and that was IT.

  34. Truesoldier__ on January 16th, 2013 4:09 pm

    Just in case anyone missed it….AQ has taken 41 people (including 7 Americans) hostage in Algeria from a BP gas field. But of course it is no big deal as AQ is no longer a threat and is on the ropes because of President "gutsy call"…..

  35. Marshall_Will on January 16th, 2013 4:15 pm

    Oh.., well, case in POINT. Yeah I'm so tired of it. Seems we JUST welcomed him onboard. It was the previous summer and we stood IN RANKS for a 2-hour photo op. It must have been 110 deg. in the hangar. Now let's give it a shot when it's '10' deg?

    I'll put in for an alternate drill, stay behind in case the phone rings or have a medical 'appt.' before I put up /w THAT cr@p again. Col. 'who'? Oh hey and we're having DRINKS up at the club..? Yea…..

  36. ????? ???? ??? on March 29th, 2016 8:53 pm

    I like this ideas is beat and number one for the world, Good business man.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.