Feb

10

Shocker: US closing embassy in one of Obama’s anti-terror success stories

Filed Under Politics, World News | 15 Comments

What a difference a few months makes:

The most dangerous thing about the Obama administration is that these clowns actually believe their own BS.

Last September:

Today:

Predicted Obama response: But this is nothing compared to the Crusades!

Comments

15 Responses to “Shocker: US closing embassy in one of Obama’s anti-terror success stories”

  1. Truesoldier__ on February 10th, 2015 6:12 pm

    I wonder what dear leader is telling the embassy staff to leave behind when they depart.

  2. Marshall_Will on February 10th, 2015 6:28 pm

    Good lord. Could this administration POSSIBLY ne more ridiculous?

    Isn't this part of a broader ( and more cynical approach ) to our simply stepping back and allowing the ME to become engulfed in flames? Oopsie! Spinning out of control. Better to stand back and…?

    At what point will congress and/or the military step in and say, we have to END this prezuhduncey before the damage becomes [entirely] unmanageable? Meanwhile ( having solved all the world's other problems ) they'll continue on w/ whatever domestic/soft coup agenda points that suits them at the moment.

  3. Truesoldier__ on February 10th, 2015 11:13 pm

    Don't count on the military. Breitbart had a story the other day about how Susan "blame the video" Rice is giving the military their marching orders:
    http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/02/08/woodwar…

    And as you pointed out, Congress is too busy cutting deals to either line their pockets (the RINO's) or increase their voting bloc (the Libs) via illegal immigration to care what dear leader is doing.

  4. Marshall_Will on February 11th, 2015 2:41 pm

    OT [but]

    The whole Anthem Healthcare 'hack' is looking more, hokey by the DAY. Firstly, security experts don't assess this as "being all that 'sophisticated' ". Secondly, they're openly wondering why the ENTIRE PATIENT DATABASE was treated as [a] singular entity!? Backdoor left wide OPEN enough for ya' 'China'? We used NK LAST time.

    Then of course there's the feel your pain moment where Anthem's CEO, Joe Swedish ( identical to Ben Bernanke's "identity theft" ) was affected 'too'. Natch all of this on the verge on the administration's big Net 'Neutrality' rollout.

    Oh PLEASE Mr. President! Give us your [throbbing] Net Screwtality, I want it NOW….! Yeah, the Sony 'hack' ( for all the LSM's better water carrying ) downgraded itself to infotainment and/or distant curiosity. SO: We.Need.Huge.NUMBERS! Give me a numbuh SURE to get their attention!? How about (8) 'million'? Nah, no GOOD. 8 'hundred'…? Nah, too BIG. Make it '80'. Yeah, THAT'S the ticket! LSM, you've got your work cut OUT for you!

  5. Truesoldier__ on February 11th, 2015 6:01 pm

    There could be much more to this than you think. One of the things that Obamacare mandated was the use of a federal records system for medical records. Everyone from the Docs to the insurance companies hate the system and Congress has been talking about gutting the expensive requirement from Obamacare. It is so bad that some doctors and hospitals have said we will pay the fine than to use your clunky, expensive system.

    This could be the administrations way of saying, 'see if only you had used OUR system your records would have been safe'. Of course anyone with an ounce of sense would see that using the database would be a disaster. Look no further than the Obamacare website for proof of that.

  6. Truesoldier__ on February 11th, 2015 6:05 pm

    Another thing is the dems on the FEC are looking to try to add rules that would regulate the internet the same way as tv airwaves when it comes to political speech. The proposals could limit discussions on blogs, YouTube videos and sites such as Drudge. They are really ramping up to try to be ready in time for 2016.

  7. Granny617 on February 12th, 2015 11:51 am

    The State Dept. ordered the Marines to destroy their weapons??? Since when is the State Dept. in charge of US troops???

  8. Truesoldier__ on February 12th, 2015 1:52 pm

    From my understanding, the State dept is in charge of the Marine contingent assigned to them. Believe it or not, this is a fairly common practice. When I was over in Iraq in 2004 (Army) we were assigned as part of the Ambassador's route security for whenever he traveled (back when the Ambassador was running Iraq via the Coalition Provisional Authority). We did not get any marching orders from the military side of the house they all came via the embassy.

    Of course, any good embassy staff would defer judgement to the highest ranking military official (in our case it was our 1LT and SFC) and not try to micromanage the military assets.

    As for the destruction of the weapons, it would depend on what they were destroying. If it was their personal arms (i.e. M4's, 240B's, M9's) then that makes no sense as you would never leave yourself undefended. On the other hand, if it was stockpiles of grenades, rockets, excess ammo (things that are going to weigh you down or you lack room for) then it would make perfect sense to destroy them as it would be too difficult to take with you. Pile them up and drop a couple of thermite grenades on the pile and watch it turn to slag.

  9. Marshall_Will on February 12th, 2015 3:26 pm

    Entirely ENTIRELY probable.

    MM warned ( like this admin's "defacto national "law enforcement" database ) the healthcare side of the house would have the same [universal] access. Can you say, Hello Police STATE?

    Oddly, the ( Army designed ) database I work w/ everyday has that same ridiculous level of accessibility. Why would some supply sgt. in the guard need to 'know' what set of chem gear an Army pvt. in uh.., Germany was ISSUED? But there it IS! This way they can; insert nefarious purpose here ____ later!

    In my estimation, the HC insurers are finding out they ARE in FACT quite pwned. Have FUN w/ that fellas!

  10. Marshall_Will on February 12th, 2015 3:29 pm

    From a safe DISTANCE of course?

  11. Marshall_Will on February 12th, 2015 3:32 pm

    I can't BELIEVE they're actually even CONTEMPLATING this!? Millions upon millions of Americans ABSOLUTELY RELY on ( round up the Usual Suspects ) Drudge, The Hill, Daily Caller, Breitbart, MM etc. as our primary source of news and updates! Uproar We Much!

    How exactly do the 'plan' on pulling this OFF? Calling Burt Wonderstone! Calling Burt Wonderstone?

  12. Truesoldier__ on February 12th, 2015 5:02 pm

    But of course.

  13. Truesoldier__ on February 12th, 2015 5:04 pm

    The only good news is that committee is split with half of the members being republican and half being democrat. Of course all it takes is one of those republicans to be a RINO and it is game over.

    Of course how much you want to bet that there would be exemptions for huffingtonpost, MSNBC, VOX, and all the other left wing outlets.

  14. Truesoldier__ on February 12th, 2015 5:08 pm

    My guess, keep it simple stupid. IT was far easier to have one massive database then to try to figure out how to grant/build unit rights, battalion rights, brigade rights, division rights, regimental rights, corps rights, etc.

  15. San Antonio Search Engine Optimization on February 12th, 2015 6:57 pm

    San Antonio Search Engine Optimization

    Shocker: US closing embassy in one of Obama?s anti-terror success stories : The Powers That Be

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.