This is One Confusing Former Zimmerman Juror

Juror “B-29” is baffling.

1) She voted to acquit George Zimmerman.

2) She’s now saying Zimmerman “got away with murder.”

3) She said there wasn’t enough evidence to convict Zimmerman of the charges:

“That’s where I felt confused,” Maddy told Roberts. “But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can’t say he’s guilty.”

So then how can she justify saying Zimmerman got away with murder? With the overwhelming lack of evidence?

My guess is this is an attempt to placate the lynch mob.

Author: Doug Powers

Doug Powers is a writer, editor and commentator covering news of the day from a conservative viewpoint with an occasional shot of irreverence and a chaser of snark. Townhall Media writer/editor. alum. Bowling novice. Long-suffering Detroit Lions fan. Contact: