Kamala Harris’ definition of ‘immoral’ is more twisted than fusilli

Did you know that if you’re against killing a baby even after 20 weeks you’re taking an “immoral” position?

That person is a current U.S. senator, former California Attorney General and probably a candidate for the Dem nomination in 2020.

You’ve gotta love the libs’ definition of what’s “immoral”: Tax cuts and not wanting to kill babies after an age they could survive outside the womb. Hopefully the DNC makes those the two biggest planks in their platform.

Author: Doug Powers

Doug Powers is a writer, editor and commentator covering news of the day from a conservative viewpoint with an occasional shot of irreverence and a chaser of snark. Townhall Media writer/editor. MichelleMalkin.com alum. Bowling novice. Long-suffering Detroit Lions fan. Contact: WriteDoug@Live.com.

One thought on “Kamala Harris’ definition of ‘immoral’ is more twisted than fusilli”

  1. This is a “debate” that is a perennial source of frustration for me. It’s become quite clear (because it’s stated over and over) that snowflakes don’t even believe in the concept of morality, much less practice it.

Comments are closed.